Stirling PDF vs Ordecto
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | A free, private PDF editor you can run on any infrastructure. | Auto-tag PDFs for accessibility: PDF/UA and WCAG 2.2 |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | US | GB |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: $0/month includes 60+ PDF tools, web/desktop/self-hosted access, open-source editor, and 1,000 monthly credits. Team: $99/month for 100 users, includes everything in Free plus single sign-on, team workspace, and central control. Enterprise: Custom pricing for regulated and air-gapped deploymen | Free: 30 repair pages per month, checking unlimited, up to 50 PDFs in workspace, files up to 250 MB and 150 pages. Studios & agencies: partner pricing per page by volume, with white label and API access available. Team: custom pricing agreed in advance, no card required to start. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 61 no change since last check | 15 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 15 | 1 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 40 | 24 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 872 | 5 |
6 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Stirling PDF More alternatives to Ordecto