Page to Image vs Glooin
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Capture, edit, and export webpages locally | Fast, simple Chrome extension for screen recording and screenshots |
| Stage | Not given | Startup |
| Founded | Not given | 2024 |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free: 9 captures per installation. Annual: €12.99 per year (launch price, normally €14.99). Lifetime: €29.99 one-time (launch price, normally €39.99). | Free plan with 10 videos and 3-minute recording limit. Paid plans are one-time payments: Starter Lifetime ($29), Pro Lifetime ($59), Power ($99). Free plan includes 1 GB storage and 25 screenshots. Starter includes 25 GB storage, 10-minute max recording, unlimited videos and screenshots. Pro include |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 8 +1 (up) since last check | 21 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 17 | 4 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 19 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 27 | 21 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Page to Image More alternatives to Glooin