| What it does | Security scanner for AI-built websites
| Independent verification for bug fixes in C, C++ and firmware
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| MVP
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Basic: Free. Pro: $19 USD/month. Business: $39 USD/month.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Live URL security scan for vibe-coded apps
- Supabase Row Level Security checks
- Exposed API key and secret detection
- WCAG accessibility audit with axe-core
- SEO and AEO technical readiness checks
- Bundle size and unused code analysis
- Lab performance measurements (LCP, CLS, FCP, TTFB)
- GitHub source and Gitleaks secret detection
- AI fix prompts for Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, Claude
- Weekly and daily scheduled monitoring
| - Reproduces bugs deterministically on base version before applying fix
- Verifies fix removal confirms bug returns
- Scans diffs for masking patterns like disabled sanitizers and weakened tests
- Runs on real hardware via STM32 NUCLEO boards and ST-Link
- Integrates with AI coding agents as MCP tool
- Posts verdicts as GitHub pull request comments
- Provides per-test verdicts: FIXED, BROKEN, FLAKY ON THE BENCH, FLAKY WORSE
- Runs entirely on your machines with no cloud dependency
- Generates reports for change records and regulatory compliance
- Runs builds and tests in Linux container on your machine
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Built specifically for AI-coded apps from Lovable, Bolt, v0, Cursor and Replit
- Evidence-based findings with severity, CWE/OWASP references and fix guidance
- Copy-paste AI fix prompts ready for your coding tool
- Real browser testing with Playwright and axe-core, not static analysis
- Scans public URLs without domain verification or credentials
| - Only verification tool that reverses the fix to prove tests actually catch the bug
- Deterministic verdict with no AI language model in decision logic
- Tests on real hardware boards, not just laptops
- Detects masking techniques that hide bugs while passing tests
- Validated public benchmark showing 4 VERIFIED and 6 REJECTED on real open-source bugs
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 1 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 2 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 14 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1 | 0 |
|---|
VibeShield
Unfix