Pinggy vs PluginView
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Create secure public URLs for localhost projects instantly without downloading any binary | Website technology detector that scans public websites to identify plugins, frameworks, analytics tools, and other web technologies |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | IN | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free plan: $0/month with single command tunneling, HTTP(S), TCP, UDP, TLS tunnels, live header manipulation, request-response inspection and replays, 60 minute tunnel timeout, random subdomains, and unlimited data transfer. Pro plan: billed annually with persistent tunnels, custom subdomains, custom | Free plan with 100 credits/month (no API, no bulk jobs). Developer $12/mo with 1,000 credits/month, 3 concurrent scans, and 100 URLs per bulk job. Growth $39/mo with 5,000 credits/month, 10 concurrent scans, and 500 URLs per bulk job. Business $99/mo with 20,000 credits/month, 25 concurrent scans, a |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 56 −1 (down) since last check | 4 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 11 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 37 | 4 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 867 | 1 |
5 details filled in for both companies.