Pinggy vs Kivel
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Create secure public URLs for localhost projects instantly without downloading any binary | Command line interface for running utilities, creating webhooks, uploading and downloading files, and calling API endpoints |
| Stage | Not given | MVP |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | IN | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free plan: $0/month with single command tunneling, HTTP(S), TCP, UDP, TLS tunnels, live header manipulation, request-response inspection and replays, 60 minute tunnel timeout, random subdomains, and unlimited data transfer. Pro plan: billed annually with persistent tunnels, custom subdomains, custom | Free: $0 with 3 agents, 1,000 hosted runs/day, 64 MiB storage. Pro: $2/month with 25 agents, 20,000 hosted runs/day, 512 MiB storage. Team: $6/month per workspace with 100 agents, 100,000 hosted runs/day, 2 GiB storage. |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 57 −1 (down) since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 11 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 37 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 867 | 0 |
5 details filled in for both companies.