| What it does | Make your site work for agents
| No-code AI QA testing for web apps that explores your app, writes end-to-end tests, and reports bugs with screenshots.
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Free trial
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Solo: $19/month (100 test executions/month, 2 projects, 30 pages explored/month), Startup: $49/month (260 test executions/month, 5 projects, 80 pages explored/month), Growth: $149/month (800 test executions/month, 15 projects, 250 pages explored/month). Enterprise: Custom pricing. 7-day free trial o
|
|---|
| Key features | - Automated and live agent simulations
- Journey - agent task recording
- Terminal-based audit tool
- Four-layer scoring system
- Real agent simulations from multiple platforms
- MCP server scoring
- Web research and registry checks
- Agent readiness research and monitoring
- API access with no authentication required
| - No SDK to install or code changes required
- Autonomous test generation covering happy paths and edge cases
- Plain-English tests with self-healing selectors
- Scheduled, CI and GitHub webhook triggered runs
- Works behind login with support for one-time codes
- Supports any web framework via URL
- 99.8% accurate self-healing selectors
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - First standard measuring how well agents can use websites
- Tests with real agents from ChatGPT, Claude, and other platforms
- Founded by creators of agent standards at Anthropic and OpenAI
- Open standard with industry partnerships
- Public research on web agent readiness
| - No tests to write or code to maintain versus managed services and frameworks like Cypress that require manual test authoring
- Self-healing selectors that target elements by context instead of CSS classes that break on markup changes
- Coverage grows continuously from scheduled and CI runs instead of only at release time
- Comprehensive AI exploration discovers edge cases and negative flows that manual QA misses
- Self-serve autonomous testing with transparent pricing versus managed QA contracts
|
| Community votes | 2 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 63 ▲ +3 (up) since last check | 5 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 22 | 5 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 46 | 19 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 811 | 30 |