| What it does | Managed AI trainers, LLM evaluators and benchmark authors for AI labs and data partners
| Independent verification for bug fixes in C, C++ and firmware
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| MVP
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | IN
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Contact for pricing
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Coding-agent benchmarks in Terminal-Bench and SWE-bench style
- Research reproduction in PaperBench style
- Model evaluation and RLHF with preference ranking
- Long-horizon agent tasks with planning and tool use
- STEM and expert reasoning questions at PhD level
- Trial task scoring before work begins
- Peer review on every item
- Senior reviewer calibration on each batch
- Product design and full-stack development for SaaS and AI
- LLM assistants and voice AI integration
| - Reproduces bugs deterministically on base version before applying fix
- Verifies fix removal confirms bug returns
- Scans diffs for masking patterns like disabled sanitizers and weakened tests
- Runs on real hardware via STM32 NUCLEO boards and ST-Link
- Integrates with AI coding agents as MCP tool
- Posts verdicts as GitHub pull request comments
- Provides per-test verdicts: FIXED, BROKEN, FLAKY ON THE BENCH, FLAKY WORSE
- Runs entirely on your machines with no cloud dependency
- Generates reports for change records and regulatory compliance
- Runs builds and tests in Linux container on your machine
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - One programme lead and point of contact instead of managing hundreds of individual profiles
- Scored trial on your rubric for every expert, not just CV and quiz screens
- Second review on every item plus senior calibration, not just spot checks
- Published quality numbers: 2,500+ tasks authored, 90% acceptance rate, 4.89/5 rating
- Pilot staffing in days with 5 to 10 experts
| - Only verification tool that reverses the fix to prove tests actually catch the bug
- Deterministic verdict with no AI language model in decision logic
- Tests on real hardware boards, not just laptops
- Detects masking techniques that hide bugs while passing tests
- Validated public benchmark showing 4 VERIFIED and 6 REJECTED on real open-source bugs
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 5 ▲ +5 (up) since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1 | 0 |
|---|
FynoLabs
Unfix