| What it does | AI-powered forensic pricing intelligence to find hidden fees in contracts, invoices, and financial documents
| Independent verification for bug fixes in C, C++ and firmware
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| MVP
|
|---|
| Founded | 2025
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | $15 one-time analysis, no subscription required
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Hidden fee detection across contracts, invoices, estimates, bills, and financing documents
- Plain-language risk reports with negotiation leverage points
- Support for multiple document formats: PDF, image, Word, and text
- Secure encrypted document processing without AI training use
- Negotiation support with questions to ask providers
| - Reproduces bugs deterministically on base version before applying fix
- Verifies fix removal confirms bug returns
- Scans diffs for masking patterns like disabled sanitizers and weakened tests
- Runs on real hardware via STM32 NUCLEO boards and ST-Link
- Integrates with AI coding agents as MCP tool
- Posts verdicts as GitHub pull request comments
- Provides per-test verdicts: FIXED, BROKEN, FLAKY ON THE BENCH, FLAKY WORSE
- Runs entirely on your machines with no cloud dependency
- Generates reports for change records and regulatory compliance
- Runs builds and tests in Linux container on your machine
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Forensic pricing intelligence that goes beyond keyword scanning to understand how pricing systems function structurally
- One-time $15 analysis with no subscription or recurring charges
- Documents are not used for AI training, with secure encrypted processing
- Results delivered in minutes with plain-language explanations
- Identifies negotiation leverage points and specific questions to ask providers
| - Only verification tool that reverses the fix to prove tests actually catch the bug
- Deterministic verdict with no AI language model in decision logic
- Tests on real hardware boards, not just laptops
- Detects masking techniques that hide bugs while passing tests
- Validated public benchmark showing 4 VERIFIED and 6 REJECTED on real open-source bugs
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 2 ● no change since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 13 | 0 |