Chanto vs Mosaic

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Chanto compared with Mosaic
Detail	Chanto	Mosaic
What it does	A fast, lean coding agent for your terminal	Everyone's AI coding sessions, in one place.
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Open source	Not given
Pricing	Not given	Not given
Key features	Starts in 13ms and uses only 17MB peak memory Works with any model: local or hosted APIs Reads Claude Code and Codex settings automatically Background runs on separate branches Verifies work by running project checks Undo function to revert changes Sandbox environment for safe command execution Spend limits and usage tracking MCP server support and plugins Scheduled runs	Not given
What makes it different	Fastest coding agent: 1.5ms CPU per turn vs 4.2-145ms for other agents Lowest memory footprint at 17MB peak vs up to 960MB for competitors Most efficient token usage on real tasks Single 20MB portable binary requiring no installation	Not given
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	Not checked yet no change since last check	30 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	0	14
Citation Flow (Majestic)	8	30
Referring domains (Majestic)	1	107

1 detail filled in for both companies.