Skip to main content

Built by makers, shipped in public

Sign in

AISA vs Humanbound

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

AISA compared with Humanbound
DetailAISA logo AISAHumanbound logo Humanbound
What it doesNot given Secure AI agents, with evidence
StageStartup Not given
Founded2026 Not given
Based inGB GR
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingFree assessment, report and certificate. Optional: AI Fluency Map ($19 one-time), AI Coach ($19/month after 7-day free trial), Master bundle ($49). Employer assessment credits at $10 each. Community: €0 (open source, 1x monthly testing volume, weekly monitoring, 3 seats, 30-day data retention). Team: €349/mo (20x monthly testing volume, 10 seats, 90-day data retention, webhooks, priority support). Enterprise: Custom pricing (contact for details).
Key features
  • Conversational assessment format that adapts to candidate answers
  • Scoring across 5 dimensions and 11 criteria
  • Evidence-based scoring with quotes from conversation
  • Free AI certificate verifiable on LinkedIn
  • Published rubric for assessment transparency
  • Role-specific assessment paths for developers, product managers, designers and data scientists
  • Second model review of full transcript before results issued
  • Multi-language support including voice dictation in 14 languages
  • AI Fluency Index tracking population benchmarks quarterly
  • Automated adversarial testing with multi-turn and agentic attack chains
  • Black-box testing without SDK installation or agent modification
  • Four-tier Humanbound Firewall with LLM judge
  • Continuous posture score from 0 to 100
  • Framework mapping to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP Agentic AI Top 10
  • Air-gapped testing with self-hosted models like Ollama
  • Export compliance evidence in HTML, PDF, JSON, SARIF, CEF formats
  • Webhook integration with SIEM and ticketing systems
  • Apache-2.0 open source CLI, testing engine, and SDK
  • Baseline campaign completion in hours
What makes it different
  • Conversational assessment tests actual AI usage rather than recall through quiz-style questions
  • High score reliability with 98% of retakers landing in same or adjacent tier
  • Completely free assessment, report and certificate with no gating or upsell required
  • Anti-gaming design with separate conversation and scoring systems plus integrity checks
  • Continuous monitoring instead of point-in-time reports
  • Adaptive multi-turn attack chains that evolve over time
  • Same open-source code as platform with nothing held back or limited
  • No account required for local open-source testing
  • Framework mapping and compliance evidence for regulatory requirements
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)45 −1 (down) since last check13 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)248
Citation Flow (Majestic)3130
Referring domains (Majestic)23971

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to AISA More alternatives to Humanbound

Ask us