Skip to main content

Built by makers, shipped in public

Sign in

Zof vs Toxic

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Zof compared with Toxic
DetailZof logo ZofToxic logo Toxic
What it doesIndependent AI verification and production control layer On-device moderation that flags hateful, abusive and threatening text in 23 European languages, before the message is sent.
StageNot given MVP
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given NL
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingStarter: $166/month ($1,990 billed annually) with 12,000 test runs/month, 3 applications, and validated fixes at $25 each. Team: $833/month ($9,990 billed annually) with 55,000 test runs/month and 10 applications. Business: $2,083/month ($25,000 billed annually) with 165,000 test runs/month, 25 appl Free up to 100k monthly active devices with unlimited inference. Custom licenses available.
Key features
  • System Graph mapping of services, dependencies, ownership, and policies
  • Verification Engine with 19 verification domains from unit tests to compliance
  • Continuous verification and change detection
  • Policy-based control and approval workflows
  • Durable evidence and audit trails
  • AI-assisted remediation with outcome-based billing
  • Integration with CI/CD, cloud, and observability tools
  • VPC, private cloud, on-prem, and air-gapped deployment
  • Identity-first with RBAC and SSO
  • Secure Enclave Runner for restricted environments
  • Three separate scores: hateful, abusive, threat
  • Ten target signals under the hate score: race, color, religion, descent, national or ethnic origin, sexual orientation, gender, disability, age, other
  • Runs fully on device with no server calls
  • Supports 23 European languages from one model file
  • 80MB model size optimized for iOS, Android, and browser
  • 0.847 macro F1 accuracy on Multilingual HateCheck
  • Warn before message is sent
  • Comment triage without infrastructure
What makes it different
  • Independent verification separates proposing changes from deciding if available evidence is sufficient
  • Model-independent design works with any approved model or deterministic systems alone
  • Outcome-based billing charges only for validated fixes that pass verification
  • Governance by default with explicit approval, audit, and no shared credentials
  • Topology-aware impact analysis using System Graph to recommend validation plans
  • Multilingual support across 23 European languages in a single 80MB model
  • Complete privacy with no data leaving the device
  • Free access up to 100k monthly active devices with unlimited inference
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)28 no change since last check37 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)520
Citation Flow (Majestic)2039
Referring domains (Majestic)62616

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Zof More alternatives to Toxic

Ask us