Skip to main content

Built by makers, shipped in public

Sign in

Zof vs SuperPentest

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Zof compared with SuperPentest
DetailZof logo ZofSuperPentest logo SuperPentest
What it doesIndependent AI verification and production control layer AI penetration testing that proves every vulnerability with independent verification
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Paid
PricingStarter: $166/month ($1,990 billed annually) with 12,000 test runs/month, 3 applications, and validated fixes at $25 each. Team: $833/month ($9,990 billed annually) with 55,000 test runs/month and 10 applications. Business: $2,083/month ($25,000 billed annually) with 165,000 test runs/month, 25 appl One-off Deep test: €3,500 one-time (includes fix retest). Standard: €990/month (4 scans per month). Deep: €2,900/month. Stress add-on: €900/month. Annual billing includes two months free.
Key features
  • System Graph mapping of services, dependencies, ownership, and policies
  • Verification Engine with 19 verification domains from unit tests to compliance
  • Continuous verification and change detection
  • Policy-based control and approval workflows
  • Durable evidence and audit trails
  • AI-assisted remediation with outcome-based billing
  • Integration with CI/CD, cloud, and observability tools
  • VPC, private cloud, on-prem, and air-gapped deployment
  • Identity-first with RBAC and SSO
  • Secure Enclave Runner for restricted environments
  • Identity replay matrix for testing authorization across multiple roles and tenants
  • Business logic invariant testing for coupon reuse and price tampering
  • Prompt injection and AI agent security testing including MCP servers
  • Independent verification with 3x reproduction requirement from clean sessions
  • 35 vulnerability classes tested deterministically
  • Scope and rules of engagement enforced in code before requests execute
  • Trust page for sharing security posture with customers and auditors
  • Mapping of findings to security compliance frameworks
  • Authorized stress testing with rate-limit discovery and circuit-breaker controls
What makes it different
  • Independent verification separates proposing changes from deciding if available evidence is sufficient
  • Model-independent design works with any approved model or deterministic systems alone
  • Outcome-based billing charges only for validated fixes that pass verification
  • Governance by default with explicit approval, audit, and no shared credentials
  • Topology-aware impact analysis using System Graph to recommend validation plans
  • Reports only verified findings that are reproduced independently from clean sessions
  • Detects cross-tenant authorization flaws through identity replay that scanners miss
  • Identifies business logic flaws that signature-based scanners cannot catch
  • No-finding-no-fee guarantee on first deep test
  • Tests AI agents and prompt injection with canary verification
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)28 no change since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)52
Citation Flow (Majestic)201
Referring domains (Majestic)622

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Zof More alternatives to SuperPentest

Ask us