Skip to main content

Built by makers, shipped in public

Sign in

Zof vs Obsilient

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Zof compared with Obsilient
DetailZof logo ZofObsilient logo Obsilient
What it doesIndependent AI verification and production control layer Reliability monitoring for autonomous agent systems
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Paid
PricingStarter: $166/month ($1,990 billed annually) with 12,000 test runs/month, 3 applications, and validated fixes at $25 each. Team: $833/month ($9,990 billed annually) with 55,000 test runs/month and 10 applications. Business: $2,083/month ($25,000 billed annually) with 165,000 test runs/month, 25 appl Fixed-fee pilot of about a month credited against the first year if continuing. Annual subscription after pilot in three tiers: Map, Gate, or Continuous.
Key features
  • System Graph mapping of services, dependencies, ownership, and policies
  • Verification Engine with 19 verification domains from unit tests to compliance
  • Continuous verification and change detection
  • Policy-based control and approval workflows
  • Durable evidence and audit trails
  • AI-assisted remediation with outcome-based billing
  • Integration with CI/CD, cloud, and observability tools
  • VPC, private cloud, on-prem, and air-gapped deployment
  • Identity-first with RBAC and SSO
  • Secure Enclave Runner for restricted environments
  • Detects agents built but never connected
  • Identifies work that silently stops between agents
  • Catches judges that grade incorrectly
  • Prevents changes shipping past broken tests
  • Detects identity and data drift
  • Measures self-repair behavior
  • Works with any model and framework
  • Read-only connector with no system changes
  • Deployment pipeline gate with pass/fail status
  • Encrypted data transmission and on-premises options
What makes it different
  • Independent verification separates proposing changes from deciding if available evidence is sufficient
  • Model-independent design works with any approved model or deterministic systems alone
  • Outcome-based billing charges only for validated fixes that pass verification
  • Governance by default with explicit approval, audit, and no shared credentials
  • Topology-aware impact analysis using System Graph to recommend validation plans
  • Finds failures that never raise an alarm
  • Built and proven on real production systems, not theory
  • Read-only connector never changes your system
  • Works with any model without depending on model vendor
  • First findings within a week of pilot start
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)28 no change since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)50
Citation Flow (Majestic)200
Referring domains (Majestic)620

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Zof More alternatives to Obsilient

Ask us