| What it does | Independent AI verification and production control layer
| AI agents that automate game testing and QA
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| DK
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Starter: $166/month ($1,990 billed annually) with 12,000 test runs/month, 3 applications, and validated fixes at $25 each. Team: $833/month ($9,990 billed annually) with 55,000 test runs/month and 10 applications. Business: $2,083/month ($25,000 billed annually) with 165,000 test runs/month, 25 appl
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - System Graph mapping of services, dependencies, ownership, and policies
- Verification Engine with 19 verification domains from unit tests to compliance
- Continuous verification and change detection
- Policy-based control and approval workflows
- Durable evidence and audit trails
- AI-assisted remediation with outcome-based billing
- Integration with CI/CD, cloud, and observability tools
- VPC, private cloud, on-prem, and air-gapped deployment
- Identity-first with RBAC and SSO
- Secure Enclave Runner for restricted environments
| - No integration required - test games without SDKs, plugins or code changes
- Plain language test instructions
- Automatic bug report generation with severity scores
- Visual and OCR analysis
- CI/CD pipeline integration
- Support for Android and desktop platforms
- Dynamic gameplay adaptation
- Video, logs and performance data capture
- Custom game-specific model training
- Skill library for player behavior simulation
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Independent verification separates proposing changes from deciding if available evidence is sufficient
- Model-independent design works with any approved model or deterministic systems alone
- Outcome-based billing charges only for validated fixes that pass verification
- Governance by default with explicit approval, audit, and no shared credentials
- Topology-aware impact analysis using System Graph to recommend validation plans
| - No engineering integration needed - QA teams can automate testing independently
- Visual black-box testing like human testers rather than script-based
- Test in plain language without scripting
- Automatic adaptation to game updates
- Detailed bug reports with visual evidence and severity scores
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 28 ● no change since last check | 51 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 5 | 14 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 28 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 62 | 442 |
|---|
Zof