| What it does | Independent AI verification and production control layer
| AI security reviewer for engineering teams
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| GB
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Starter: $166/month ($1,990 billed annually) with 12,000 test runs/month, 3 applications, and validated fixes at $25 each. Team: $833/month ($9,990 billed annually) with 55,000 test runs/month and 10 applications. Business: $2,083/month ($25,000 billed annually) with 165,000 test runs/month, 25 appl
| Free for up to 2 active contributors or open source projects. Starter $95/month for up to 5 contributors, Team $195/month for up to 15 contributors, Growth $395/month for up to 40 contributors. Annual subscriptions billed upfront at ten times the monthly price (2 months free).
|
|---|
| Key features | - System Graph mapping of services, dependencies, ownership, and policies
- Verification Engine with 19 verification domains from unit tests to compliance
- Continuous verification and change detection
- Policy-based control and approval workflows
- Durable evidence and audit trails
- AI-assisted remediation with outcome-based billing
- Integration with CI/CD, cloud, and observability tools
- VPC, private cloud, on-prem, and air-gapped deployment
- Identity-first with RBAC and SSO
- Secure Enclave Runner for restricted environments
| - Codebase context mapping across repositories and components
- Architecture review and security assumptions analysis
- Focused vulnerability hunting with specialised security lenses
- Finding validation and deduplication
- HTML reports with source locations and suggested fixes
- Review state dashboard with findings filtered by severity
- CLI and terminal dashboard interface
- Support for Claude, Codex and OpenCode AI models
- Unlimited repositories and Dokima runs per plan
- Local data processing without uploading findings
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Independent verification separates proposing changes from deciding if available evidence is sufficient
- Model-independent design works with any approved model or deterministic systems alone
- Outcome-based billing charges only for validated fixes that pass verification
- Governance by default with explicit approval, audit, and no shared credentials
- Topology-aware impact analysis using System Graph to recommend validation plans
| - AI-powered security review that learns how your software works and keeps reviewing as code evolves
- Findings challenged before presentation to separate plausible issues from weak ones
- Choose your own AI models to suit your budget and privacy preferences
- Full product trial for 21 days with no payment card required
- Free forever for small teams up to 2 contributors and open source projects
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 28 ● no change since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 5 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 20 | 0 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 62 | 1 |
|---|
Zof