Skip to main content

Built by makers, shipped in public

Sign in

Zof vs Dock

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Zof compared with Dock
DetailZof logo ZofDock logo Dock
What it doesIndependent AI verification and production control layer One-click molecular docking with AutoDock Vina in your browser
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Not given
PricingStarter: $166/month ($1,990 billed annually) with 12,000 test runs/month, 3 applications, and validated fixes at $25 each. Team: $833/month ($9,990 billed annually) with 55,000 test runs/month and 10 applications. Business: $2,083/month ($25,000 billed annually) with 165,000 test runs/month, 25 appl Not given
Key features
  • System Graph mapping of services, dependencies, ownership, and policies
  • Verification Engine with 19 verification domains from unit tests to compliance
  • Continuous verification and change detection
  • Policy-based control and approval workflows
  • Durable evidence and audit trails
  • AI-assisted remediation with outcome-based billing
  • Integration with CI/CD, cloud, and observability tools
  • VPC, private cloud, on-prem, and air-gapped deployment
  • Identity-first with RBAC and SSO
  • Secure Enclave Runner for restricted environments
  • Automated receptor and ligand preparation via Meeko
  • Batch screening up to 300 ligands per job
  • Publication-ready PDF reports with embedded figures
  • 2D and 3D interaction diagrams with PLIP
  • PoseBusters automated pose quality validation
  • ADMET analysis including Lipinski, Veber, and QED
  • Custom docking box definition with 3D visualization
  • Co-crystal redock validation against crystal poses
  • Interactive 3D viewer for pose inspection
  • Optional PyMOL publication-quality binding site rendering
What makes it different
  • Independent verification separates proposing changes from deciding if available evidence is sufficient
  • Model-independent design works with any approved model or deterministic systems alone
  • Outcome-based billing charges only for validated fixes that pass verification
  • Governance by default with explicit approval, audit, and no shared credentials
  • Topology-aware impact analysis using System Graph to recommend validation plans
  • No software installation or local computing required
  • Fully reproducible, documented pipeline with exact software versions recorded per job
  • Automated Methods text and citations ready for manuscript submission
  • Batch parallel docking with per-ligand failure tolerance
  • Secure cloud processing with immediate data deletion after job completion
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)28 no change since last check2 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)50
Citation Flow (Majestic)2017
Referring domains (Majestic)629

3 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Zof More alternatives to Dock

Ask us