Skip to main content

Built by makers, shipped in public

Sign in

Zof vs Corvis

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Zof compared with Corvis
DetailZof logo ZofCorvis logo Corvis
What it doesIndependent AI verification and production control layer The night watch for apps built with AI that tests checkout on every preview, watches live apps and payments, and identifies the deploy behind a break
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inNot given IN
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingStarter: $166/month ($1,990 billed annually) with 12,000 test runs/month, 3 applications, and validated fixes at $25 each. Team: $833/month ($9,990 billed annually) with 55,000 test runs/month and 10 applications. Business: $2,083/month ($25,000 billed annually) with 165,000 test runs/month, 25 appl Watch: Free (1 app, 1 journey read-only on production daily, security checks, 1 uptime monitor). Guard: $19/month (5 journeys on every preview and production deploy, business pulse, 20 auto-fixes a month, 10 monitors). Guard + Calls: $49/month (everything in Guard plus 10 journeys per app, Corvis ca
Key features
  • System Graph mapping of services, dependencies, ownership, and policies
  • Verification Engine with 19 verification domains from unit tests to compliance
  • Continuous verification and change detection
  • Policy-based control and approval workflows
  • Durable evidence and audit trails
  • AI-assisted remediation with outcome-based billing
  • Integration with CI/CD, cloud, and observability tools
  • VPC, private cloud, on-prem, and air-gapped deployment
  • Identity-first with RBAC and SSO
  • Secure Enclave Runner for restricted environments
  • Journey testing on preview deployments in real browser
  • Security checks on every push
  • Uptime monitoring
  • Leaked key detection and rotation help
  • Screenshot and fix brief for failing steps
  • Telegram alerts with voice briefings
  • Export journeys as Playwright tests
  • Supabase row-level security check and auto-fix
What makes it different
  • Independent verification separates proposing changes from deciding if available evidence is sufficient
  • Model-independent design works with any approved model or deterministic systems alone
  • Outcome-based billing charges only for validated fixes that pass verification
  • Governance by default with explicit approval, audit, and no shared credentials
  • Topology-aware impact analysis using System Graph to recommend validation plans
  • Tests real customer journeys in a real browser on every preview, not AI-generated tests grading their own work
  • Learns your app's normal payment and signup patterns to detect drops when they occur
  • Works across Vercel, Supabase and Stripe together for full app visibility
  • Calls you on critical issues like stopped payments instead of just sending alerts
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)28 no change since last checkNot checked yet no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)50
Citation Flow (Majestic)200
Referring domains (Majestic)620

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Zof More alternatives to Corvis

Ask us