Viaduct vs QuotaSense
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Free C4 modeling tool with an MCP server for software teams to share architecture context with AI development tools | Monitor your coding agent quota and spending in real time across all devices |
| Stage | Not given | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | LT | AU |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Browser: Free with account. Desktop: €10 a month after 7-day free trial, one licence covers 3 machines. Enterprise: custom pricing. | Free: US$0 for up to 3 machines with basic dashboard cards on home network. Pro: US$2.99 a month, US$19.99 a year, or US$99.99 once for up to 10 machines with all dashboard cards, phone alerts, and encrypted relay. Founders get US$14.99 for the first year of yearly Pro, then US$19.99/year. Lifetime |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 3 +1 (up) since last check | Not checked yet no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 10 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 28 | 0 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 74 | 0 |
6 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Viaduct More alternatives to QuotaSense