| What it does | AI code review and codebase risk assessment for apps built by AI tools
| Independent AI verification and production control layer
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Starter: $166/month ($1,990 billed annually) with 12,000 test runs/month, 3 applications, and validated fixes at $25 each. Team: $833/month ($9,990 billed annually) with 55,000 test runs/month and 10 applications. Business: $2,083/month ($25,000 billed annually) with 165,000 test runs/month, 25 appl
|
|---|
| Key features | - Assessment across twelve domains
- Readiness score and levels
- GitHub repository integration
- Security and secrets scanning
- Architecture and code quality evaluation
- Open source license analysis
- Data privacy compliance assessment
- Reactabot AI assistant for follow-up questions
- Shareable technical readiness report
- Effort and remediation guidance
| - System Graph mapping of services, dependencies, ownership, and policies
- Verification Engine with 19 verification domains from unit tests to compliance
- Continuous verification and change detection
- Policy-based control and approval workflows
- Durable evidence and audit trails
- AI-assisted remediation with outcome-based billing
- Integration with CI/CD, cloud, and observability tools
- VPC, private cloud, on-prem, and air-gapped deployment
- Identity-first with RBAC and SSO
- Secure Enclave Runner for restricted environments
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Assesses AI-generated code across twelve domains including security, architecture, and technical debt
- Readiness score understandable by non-technical decision makers
- Read-only GitHub integration that never modifies repositories
- Grounded findings with evidence and severity classification
- Works with any AI builder that pushes to GitHub
| - Independent verification separates proposing changes from deciding if available evidence is sufficient
- Model-independent design works with any approved model or deterministic systems alone
- Outcome-based billing charges only for validated fixes that pass verification
- Governance by default with explicit approval, audit, and no shared credentials
- Topology-aware impact analysis using System Graph to recommend validation plans
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | 28 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 3 | 5 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 17 | 20 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 5 | 62 |
|---|
Zof