reachpad vs Stacktree

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

reachpad compared with Stacktree
Detail	reachpad	Stacktree
What it does	Google Docs for AI apps	Send client work as a link, not an attachment
Stage	Not given	Not given
Founded	Not given	Not given
Based in	US	GB
Pricing model	Free	Freemium
Pricing	Not given	Free: 3 pages; Solo: $19/month (25 pages, 1 custom domain, 1 client space); Studio: $79/month (unlimited pages, 10 custom domains, 10 client spaces); Firm: $249/month (unlimited pages, 25 custom domains, unlimited client spaces); Enterprise: billed annually, custom pricing.
Key features	Publish apps with their own shareable links Publish from coding agents via MCP server Version history with individual links per version Flexible access control with passwords and expiry Invite viewers and editors by email Restore earlier versions as the live version	Replace pages in place without changing the URL Works with ChatGPT, Claude, and other AI agents Client spaces with dedicated portals per client Passcode and email domain gates Custom domains on your agency's domain Version history with rollback capability
What makes it different	Built specifically for AI agents to publish directly Collaborative editing with multiple agents on same app Permanent version history where each version stays accessible	Half of published pages change after being sent, so replace-in-place saves resending Works as an MCP server with Claude, ChatGPT and other agents Agency-focused with dedicated client portals and multiple custom domains Analytics show engagement depth, not just opens
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	10 no change since last check	54 +1 (up) since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	5	9
Citation Flow (Majestic)	28	34
Referring domains (Majestic)	106	245

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to reachpad More alternatives to Stacktree