| What it does | Open source code review inside your coding agent before you push
| No-code AI QA testing for web apps that explores your app, writes end-to-end tests, and reports bugs with screenshots.
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | 2024
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Open source
| Free trial
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free. Open source under Apache 2.0 license.
| Solo: $19/month (100 test executions/month, 2 projects, 30 pages explored/month), Startup: $49/month (260 test executions/month, 5 projects, 80 pages explored/month), Growth: $149/month (800 test executions/month, 15 projects, 250 pages explored/month). Enterprise: Custom pricing. 7-day free trial o
|
|---|
| Key features | - 22 built-in scanners for secrets, security, dependencies and lint errors
- Code graph showing callers and importers of changed code
- Separate reviewer process using Claude Code or Codex
- Script-based validation of review completeness
- Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and Cline
- Terminal, agent and CI integration
- GitHub Action for pull request reviews
- Pre-commit and pre-push hooks
- Custom scanner configuration from GitHub
- No telemetry or data collection
| - No SDK to install or code changes required
- Autonomous test generation covering happy paths and edge cases
- Plain-English tests with self-healing selectors
- Scheduled, CI and GitHub webhook triggered runs
- Works behind login with support for one-time codes
- Supports any web framework via URL
- 99.8% accurate self-healing selectors
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No API key, account or server required - runs entirely on your local machine
- Separate reviewer process with no memory of the coding session that produced the code
- Open source Apache 2.0 license with full transparency
- Integrated directly into coding agents without additional configuration
- Findings only on changed lines, not whole repository
| - No tests to write or code to maintain versus managed services and frameworks like Cypress that require manual test authoring
- Self-healing selectors that target elements by context instead of CSS classes that break on markup changes
- Coverage grows continuously from scheduled and CI runs instead of only at release time
- Comprehensive AI exploration discovers edge cases and negative flows that manual QA misses
- Self-serve autonomous testing with transparent pricing versus managed QA contracts
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 42 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 5 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 17 | 5 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 22 | 19 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 316 | 30 |
|---|
TestOptim AI