| What it does | AI agents that automate game testing and QA
| No-code AI QA testing for web apps that explores your app, writes end-to-end tests, and reports bugs with screenshots.
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | DK
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Free trial
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Solo: $19/month (100 test executions/month, 2 projects, 30 pages explored/month), Startup: $49/month (260 test executions/month, 5 projects, 80 pages explored/month), Growth: $149/month (800 test executions/month, 15 projects, 250 pages explored/month). Enterprise: Custom pricing. 7-day free trial o
|
|---|
| Key features | - No integration required - test games without SDKs, plugins or code changes
- Plain language test instructions
- Automatic bug report generation with severity scores
- Visual and OCR analysis
- CI/CD pipeline integration
- Support for Android and desktop platforms
- Dynamic gameplay adaptation
- Video, logs and performance data capture
- Custom game-specific model training
- Skill library for player behavior simulation
| - No SDK to install or code changes required
- Autonomous test generation covering happy paths and edge cases
- Plain-English tests with self-healing selectors
- Scheduled, CI and GitHub webhook triggered runs
- Works behind login with support for one-time codes
- Supports any web framework via URL
- 99.8% accurate self-healing selectors
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No engineering integration needed - QA teams can automate testing independently
- Visual black-box testing like human testers rather than script-based
- Test in plain language without scripting
- Automatic adaptation to game updates
- Detailed bug reports with visual evidence and severity scores
| - No tests to write or code to maintain versus managed services and frameworks like Cypress that require manual test authoring
- Self-healing selectors that target elements by context instead of CSS classes that break on markup changes
- Coverage grows continuously from scheduled and CI runs instead of only at release time
- Comprehensive AI exploration discovers edge cases and negative flows that manual QA misses
- Self-serve autonomous testing with transparent pricing versus managed QA contracts
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 51 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 5 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 14 | 5 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 28 | 19 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 442 | 30 |
|---|
TestOptim AI