| What it does | Independent auditing for AI agents
| AI agents that automate game testing and QA
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | US
| DK
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Freemium
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing | Startup: 2 audits/reports per month, up to 3 agents. Growth: 4 audits/reports per month, up to 3 agents. Enterprise: 8 audits/reports per month, up to 3 agents. Agentic Enterprise: custom quote, 4+ agents. Free open-source: 60 inspections, self-hosted.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Multidimensional audit covering AI red teaming, operational assurance, philosophical, ethical and sociological dimensions
- Tests for prompt injection, policy violation, tool invocation governance, and authorization
- Assesses epistemic integrity, reality grounding, and frankness
- Evaluates fairness governance and vulnerable user care
- Analyzes stakeholder conflict, influence and systemic risk
- Connect through GitHub or MCP with no manual setup required
- Generates audit reports with evidence and proof of agent behavior
- Open-source engine available for self-hosting
- Detects information hiding, unauthorized decision override, and unauthorized actions
| - No integration required - test games without SDKs, plugins or code changes
- Plain language test instructions
- Automatic bug report generation with severity scores
- Visual and OCR analysis
- CI/CD pipeline integration
- Support for Android and desktop platforms
- Dynamic gameplay adaptation
- Video, logs and performance data capture
- Custom game-specific model training
- Skill library for player behavior simulation
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Truly independent auditing through outside panel judgment, never internal self-inspection
- Off-the-shelf integration with no manual eval harness or SDK embedding required
- Covers five dimensions of trust: purpose, authority, workflows, responsibility and evidence
- Measures beyond performance to identify misalignment across red teaming, operational, philosophical, ethical and sociological categories
| - No engineering integration needed - QA teams can automate testing independently
- Visual black-box testing like human testers rather than script-based
- Test in plain language without scripting
- Automatic adaptation to game updates
- Detailed bug reports with visual evidence and severity scores
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 13 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | 51 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 11 | 14 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 31 | 28 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 156 | 442 |
|---|
iFixAi