Skip to main content

Built by makers, shipped in public

Sign in

Humanbound vs Zof

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Humanbound compared with Zof
DetailHumanbound logo HumanboundZof logo Zof
What it doesSecure AI agents, with evidence Independent AI verification and production control layer
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inGR Not given
Pricing modelFreemium Freemium
PricingCommunity: €0 (open source, 1x monthly testing volume, weekly monitoring, 3 seats, 30-day data retention). Team: €349/mo (20x monthly testing volume, 10 seats, 90-day data retention, webhooks, priority support). Enterprise: Custom pricing (contact for details). Starter: $166/month ($1,990 billed annually) with 12,000 test runs/month, 3 applications, and validated fixes at $25 each. Team: $833/month ($9,990 billed annually) with 55,000 test runs/month and 10 applications. Business: $2,083/month ($25,000 billed annually) with 165,000 test runs/month, 25 appl
Key features
  • Automated adversarial testing with multi-turn and agentic attack chains
  • Black-box testing without SDK installation or agent modification
  • Four-tier Humanbound Firewall with LLM judge
  • Continuous posture score from 0 to 100
  • Framework mapping to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP Agentic AI Top 10
  • Air-gapped testing with self-hosted models like Ollama
  • Export compliance evidence in HTML, PDF, JSON, SARIF, CEF formats
  • Webhook integration with SIEM and ticketing systems
  • Apache-2.0 open source CLI, testing engine, and SDK
  • Baseline campaign completion in hours
  • System Graph mapping of services, dependencies, ownership, and policies
  • Verification Engine with 19 verification domains from unit tests to compliance
  • Continuous verification and change detection
  • Policy-based control and approval workflows
  • Durable evidence and audit trails
  • AI-assisted remediation with outcome-based billing
  • Integration with CI/CD, cloud, and observability tools
  • VPC, private cloud, on-prem, and air-gapped deployment
  • Identity-first with RBAC and SSO
  • Secure Enclave Runner for restricted environments
What makes it different
  • Continuous monitoring instead of point-in-time reports
  • Adaptive multi-turn attack chains that evolve over time
  • Same open-source code as platform with nothing held back or limited
  • No account required for local open-source testing
  • Framework mapping and compliance evidence for regulatory requirements
  • Independent verification separates proposing changes from deciding if available evidence is sufficient
  • Model-independent design works with any approved model or deterministic systems alone
  • Outcome-based billing charges only for validated fixes that pass verification
  • Governance by default with explicit approval, audit, and no shared credentials
  • Topology-aware impact analysis using System Graph to recommend validation plans
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)13 no change since last check28 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)85
Citation Flow (Majestic)3020
Referring domains (Majestic)7162

5 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Humanbound More alternatives to Zof

Ask us