Skip to main content

Built by makers, shipped in public

Sign in

Humanbound vs modl.ai

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

Humanbound compared with modl.ai
DetailHumanbound logo Humanbound modl.ai
What it doesSecure AI agents, with evidence AI agents that automate game testing and QA
StageNot given Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inGR DK
Pricing modelFreemium Not given
PricingCommunity: €0 (open source, 1x monthly testing volume, weekly monitoring, 3 seats, 30-day data retention). Team: €349/mo (20x monthly testing volume, 10 seats, 90-day data retention, webhooks, priority support). Enterprise: Custom pricing (contact for details). Not given
Key features
  • Automated adversarial testing with multi-turn and agentic attack chains
  • Black-box testing without SDK installation or agent modification
  • Four-tier Humanbound Firewall with LLM judge
  • Continuous posture score from 0 to 100
  • Framework mapping to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP Agentic AI Top 10
  • Air-gapped testing with self-hosted models like Ollama
  • Export compliance evidence in HTML, PDF, JSON, SARIF, CEF formats
  • Webhook integration with SIEM and ticketing systems
  • Apache-2.0 open source CLI, testing engine, and SDK
  • Baseline campaign completion in hours
  • No integration required - test games without SDKs, plugins or code changes
  • Plain language test instructions
  • Automatic bug report generation with severity scores
  • Visual and OCR analysis
  • CI/CD pipeline integration
  • Support for Android and desktop platforms
  • Dynamic gameplay adaptation
  • Video, logs and performance data capture
  • Custom game-specific model training
  • Skill library for player behavior simulation
What makes it different
  • Continuous monitoring instead of point-in-time reports
  • Adaptive multi-turn attack chains that evolve over time
  • Same open-source code as platform with nothing held back or limited
  • No account required for local open-source testing
  • Framework mapping and compliance evidence for regulatory requirements
  • No engineering integration needed - QA teams can automate testing independently
  • Visual black-box testing like human testers rather than script-based
  • Test in plain language without scripting
  • Automatic adaptation to game updates
  • Detailed bug reports with visual evidence and severity scores
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)13 no change since last check51 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)814
Citation Flow (Majestic)3028
Referring domains (Majestic)71442

4 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to Humanbound More alternatives to modl.ai

Ask us