| What it does | Managed AI trainers, LLM evaluators and benchmark authors for AI labs and data partners
| Evidence laid out, not a lone percentage.
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | IN
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Contact for pricing
| Freemium
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Free plan: 4 welcome credits (1 full report). Pro: $19/month for 300 credits/month. Team: $59/month for 1500 credits/month. Each report costs 4 credits.
|
|---|
| Key features | - Coding-agent benchmarks in Terminal-Bench and SWE-bench style
- Research reproduction in PaperBench style
- Model evaluation and RLHF with preference ranking
- Long-horizon agent tasks with planning and tool use
- STEM and expert reasoning questions at PhD level
- Trial task scoring before work begins
- Peer review on every item
- Senior reviewer calibration on each batch
- Product design and full-stack development for SaaS and AI
- LLM assistants and voice AI integration
| - Cross-checks four independent detection models
- Deterministic evidence trump card (C2PA credentials, generator self-tags)
- Published weighted-vote rule (30% each for Sightengine, Winston AI, Was It AI; 10% for SAFE)
- Batch screening of up to 50 images at once
- Graded conclusions with disagreement reported
- Shareable report links and forensic PDF download
- Support for JPEG, PNG, WebP up to 12MB
- Generator-specific classification (Midjourney, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, Flux, Imagen, Adobe Firefly, Ideogram)
- SHA-256 file hash recording for chain-of-custody
- Private uploads, shared only via report link
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - One programme lead and point of contact instead of managing hundreds of individual profiles
- Scored trial on your rubric for every expert, not just CV and quiz screens
- Second review on every item plus senior calibration, not just spot checks
- Published quality numbers: 2,500+ tasks authored, 90% acceptance rate, 4.89/5 rating
- Pilot staffing in days with 5 to 10 experts
| - Published weighted-vote rule with every vote shown by name instead of hidden percentages
- Reports disagreement honestly instead of blending signals into one number
- Automatic credit refund when an engine fails
- Full product access in free tier (not a limited teaser)
- Deterministic file evidence (C2PA, metadata) that outranks model votes
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | 40 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 13 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 27 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1 | 102 |