Foldif vs InstaPrompt
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Organize ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini conversations into folders with highlights, notes, and exportable books | Highlight text on any web page and get an instant AI result. No tab switching. No copy-pasting. |
| Stage | MVP | Not given |
| Founded | Not given | Not given |
| Based in | Not given | Not given |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Pricing | Free tier (limited quotas); Founder Lifetime $69 one-time for first 100 customers (then $79, $99, $139 as tiers fill); Lifetime $139 one-time. All Pro features and future updates included. | Free: ~25 AI uses per month, 3 saved responses, 3 custom prompts, 1 label. Starter: $4.99/month or $3.25/month billed annually, ~500 AI uses per month, 10 saved responses, 15 custom prompts, 5 labels. Pro: $11.99/month or $8.25/month billed annually, ~2,500 AI uses per month, choose any AI model, br |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 1 −1 (down) since last check | 1 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 3 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 24 | 18 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 98 | 10 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Foldif More alternatives to InstaPrompt