ContextStream vs Mosaic

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

ContextStream compared with Mosaic
Detail	ContextStream	Mosaic
What it does	Shared project context for AI coding agents	Everyone's AI coding sessions, in one place.
Stage	Startup	Not given
Founded	2024	Not given
Based in	Not given	Not given
Pricing model	Freemium	Not given
Pricing	Starter: Free with 10,000 credits every month, 1 user, up to 15 projects. Pro: $19/month with 25,000 credits every month, 1 user, unlimited projects. Elite: $49/month with 100,000 credits every month, 1 user, unlimited projects. Team: $79/user/month with 200,000 credits per seat pooled, 3+ users, $2	Not given
Key features	Hosted code search with indexing and dependency graphs Save and retrieve project decisions with reasoning Record lessons from past work to guide future tasks Plans, runbooks, and handoffs for agent coordination MCP integration with Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Grok Change impact analysis and code health metrics Team collaboration with shared workspaces Privacy controls and access permissions ContextCode CLI and VS Code extension Knowledge Atlas to explore code and project connections	Not given
What makes it different	Switch agents without re-explaining the project Decisions and lessons carry over across sessions and tools Full-featured free plan with 10,000 monthly credits High code recall (99.38%) and memory accuracy (91.4%) Evidence-based answers with source attribution	Not given
Free plan	Not given	Not given
Open source	Not given	Not given
Platforms	Not given	Not given
Public API	Not given	Not given
Community votes	0	0
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)	32 +2 (up) since last check	30 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)	5	14
Citation Flow (Majestic)	36	30
Referring domains (Majestic)	109	107

1 detail filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to ContextStream More alternatives to Mosaic